ChatGPT寫出來的托福作文能得幾分？

ChatGPT從(cong) 問世以來，短短一個(ge) 月用戶破億(yi) 。大眾(zhong) 第一時間解鎖了它的各種用途，從(cong) 寫(xie) 作業(ye) 到改論文，從(cong) 閑聊到解決(jue) 各種人生的疑難雜症。它可以迅速在網上搜索給定話題的相關(guan) 信息並在最短時間內(nei) 給出有效回複。

這次我們(men) 以2月26日托福獨立寫(xie) 作題為(wei) 例，看看它給出的文章可以達到一個(ge) 怎樣的水準。

題目：

Some high school teachers (teachers of students aged 14-18) spend most of the class time lecturing while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of the class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas. Which of these two approaches do you think is more effective for student's learning and why?

老師給出的題目分析：這個(ge) 題目本身是常見的二選一話題，但是由於(yu) 篇幅較長，需要花更多時間去思考並提煉出題目的內(nei) 核。這個(ge) 話題最核心的元素是教學方法，也就是哪一種教學方法更有利於(yu) 學生的學習(xi) ，如果決(jue) 定支持其中一種教學法，需要給出兩(liang) 個(ge) 段落來論述為(wei) 什麽(me) 這種方法更有利於(yu) 學生的學習(xi) 。

ChatGPT給出的文章如下，這篇文章從(cong) 題目粘貼進去到出現答案，隻花了不到30s，速度相當快，我們(men) 來看看，如此快速的回複會(hui) 不會(hui) 有點草率。

The effectiveness of a teaching approach depends on various factors such as the subject matter, student's cognitive ability, and learning styles.However, in general, a teaching approach that involves discussion and projects, where students are highly involved in exchanging their ideas, is more effective for student's learning than a lecture-based approach.

Firstly, discussion and project-based approaches promote active engagement among students. Students are encouraged to participate in class activities, share their opinions, and ask questions, which promotes critical thinking and enhances their understanding of the subject. When students are engaged in the learning process, they are more likely to retain information and apply it in real-life situations.

Secondly, discussion and project-based approaches are student-centered, allowing students to take ownership of their learning. In this approach, the teacher acts as a facilitator, guiding students through the learning process while students take the lead in their own learning. This approach empowers students to learn at their own pace, explore their interests and develop their problem-solving and collaborative skills.

On the other hand, the lecture-based approach has several limitations.

Students can become passive learners, where they are only expected to listen and take notes without actively engaging in the learning process. This approach may not cater to different learning styles, and students who may not learn best by listening may struggle to understand the subject matter. Additionally, students may not retain the information provided in a lecture-based approach, as they may not be able to apply the information in real-life situations.

In conclusion, the discussion and project-based approach are more effective for student's learning as it promotes active engagement, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. It also empowers students to take ownership of their learning, explore their interests, and retain the information better than a lecture-based approach.

這篇文章，首先令人羨慕的是語法和詞匯，雖然在課堂上我們(men) 一再強調使用目前水準能駕馭的詞匯和句型就好（這實際上是為(wei) 了短時間內(nei) 出分迫不得已的選擇，真正體(ti) 現寫(xie) 作水準高低的，到最後還是要看詞匯語法和修辭），這篇在詞匯和語法這塊已經達到了滿分?，用詞用語相當地道，我們(men) 之前雖然也有很多的同學在寫(xie) 作這塊拿到過滿分，但是論語言的運用，肯定比不了語料庫齊全的AI係統。

從(cong) 評分來看，首先看文章是否扣題，有沒有貨不對版的情況出現。這篇基本上扣題還是比較準的，寫(xie) 作也都圍繞自己觀點進行論述，沒有出現模棱兩(liang) 可，但是呢，文章的觀點之間實際上有互相交疊的成分存在，每個(ge) 觀點似乎並沒有整理或者總結清楚，或者說，我們(men) 實際上有更好的表達方式來應對這篇文章給出的語料。

作為(wei) 一個(ge) 寫(xie) 作老師，這篇文章是給不出滿分的，因為(wei) 寫(xie) 作本身有很大一部分是需要說服他人。整體(ti) 而言，這篇文章的論述還是很不錯的，但實際上，我們(men) 在說服他人的過程中可以加入一些更豐(feng) 富的元素，比如舉(ju) 例子來證明自己的觀點，增加文章的豐(feng) 富性和可信度。其次，在寫(xie) 作過程當中，可以圍繞一個(ge) 觀點把事情寫(xie) 明白，但是這篇通篇下來文章觀點和內(nei) 容都比較多，但是論述過程有時候稍微有一丟(diu) 丟(diu) 的偏移，所以，綜合下來，總分大概能有25-26左右。

我們(men) 可以借鑒AI給出的資料和一些觀點，也可以通過閱讀ChatGPT給出的文章學習(xi) 一些詞匯和語言的表達。但是可以在論述的過程中用上更多專(zhuan) 門屬於(yu) 應試的課堂上講過的內(nei) 容進行擴展和調整，從(cong) 而保證寫(xie) 作的應試質量。