雅思大作文7分範文及解析：老師決定教學內容

觀點類大作文，教育類話題

The subjects and lesson contents are decided by the authorities such as the government. Some people argue that teachers should make the choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

題目來源：2009年8月13日大陸雅思大作文

1、題目大意

科目和課程內(nei) 容由政府等當局決(jue) 定。有些人認為(wei) 教師應該做出選擇。您在多大程度上同意或不同意？

2、思路解析

這是一道觀點類，聊的是教師對課程內(nei) 容能否選擇的問題。審題時注意一點，題目中第一句話為(wei) 背景句，不需要去討論它的對錯，重點在於(yu) 老師是否能夠“make the choice”，下麵王珍老師帶大家一起來看下具體(ti) 觀點。

首先來看同意的角度，有兩(liang) 方麵。

一是能夠滿足學生多樣性需求，教師由於(yu) 和學生接觸時間更久，相較於(yu) 政府等部門能夠更加了解學生的個(ge) 性化需求和背景，可以根據學生的不同特點和興(xing) 趣定製教學內(nei) 容，從(cong) 而提高學生的學習(xi) 效率和興(xing) 趣。

二是能夠及時提升教學創新，教師在教學實踐中可能發現新的教學方法或內(nei) 容，這種現場的創新和調整對於(yu) 教育的進步至關(guan) 重要。

再來看反對的角度，同樣有兩(liang) 個(ge) 切入點。

一是違背教育公平性以及導致教育質量不可控。由於(yu) 老師個(ge) 體(ti) 之間存在差異，很難保證輸出同樣的內(nei) 容，因此政府統一製定教學大綱可以確保不同地區、不同學校之間的教育內(nei) 容具有一致性，減少教育資源不均的問題，並且可以通過製定統一的教學標準和評估係統來保證教育質量。

二是老師製定教學內(nei) 容可能會(hui) 存在短視的問題。國家層麵的教育規劃通常與(yu) 國家發展戰略密切相關(guan) ，比如培養(yang) 特定的行業(ye) 人才，政府製定的教學內(nei) 容能夠更好地服務於(yu) 國家的長遠目標和社會(hui) 需求。

總結來說：教育是國家軟實力重點，是國家人才戰略的實施手段。因此，教學內(nei) 容如果大部分被老師自己決(jue) 定，那麽(me) 一定會(hui) 存在極大的差異性，並且，由於(yu) 教師們(men) 不見得熟悉國家政策與(yu) 未來戰略，他們(men) 的選擇可能出現偏差。但是我們(men) 承認，少量的自由選擇能讓最熟悉學生的一線老師們(men) 提供適合學生的拓展練習(xi) ，對學生是非常有益的。

3、提綱

4、高分範文示例

In numerous countries, a standardized curriculum has been integrated into their educational frameworks. Yet, there exists a burgeoning debate suggesting that the onus of curriculum development should rest with educators rather than governmental bodies. While I acknowledge the merits of entrusting teachers with this responsibility, I firmly believe that the ultimate decision should reside with the governing authorities.

Educators possess a unique vantage point, being directly involved in the dissemination of knowledge. The curriculum set forth by governmental entities often stems from a broader perspective, emphasizing the nation's holistic development. Here, education is perceived as a pivotal instrument for bolstering the national economy and fortifying societal stability. Such a curriculum, governed by overarching national objectives, often aims to mould students into competent citizens and workforce members, potentially sidelining their individual nuances. On the other hand, educators, with their proximity to students, might be better positioned to tailor curricula that align more closely with students' innate aptitudes. This could foster a more diverse curriculum, thereby nurturing students' individual growth and fostering creativity.

Nevertheless, it's imperative to recognize that curricula endorsed by authorities are typically the culmination of insights from educational experts, buttressed by years of empirical evidence. Such curricula have been instrumental in shaping myriad talents globally. While an educator-driven curriculum might enhance diversity, it could compromise the holistic nature of education, inadvertently omitting fundamental knowledge. Moreover, in the absence of a nationally endorsed standard, disparities in educational quality could emerge, leading to pronounced inequities among students from different institutions.

In conclusion, while the involvement of teachers in curriculum development is undeniably valuable, the prerogative should ultimately lie with governmental bodies to ensure a consistent, comprehensive, and high-calibre education for all students.

5、相關(guan) 詞匯和語法結構

integrated into 集成到

burgeoning debate 迅速增長的辯論

ultimate decision 最終決(jue) 定

unique vantage point 獨特的觀點

dissemination of knowledge 知識傳(chuan) 播

broader perspective 更廣泛的視角

pivotal instrument 關(guan) 鍵工具

fortifying societal stability 加強社會(hui) 穩定

overarching national objectives 總體(ti) 國家目標

mould students into 塑造學生成為(wei)

innate aptitudes 天生的才能

buttressed by years of empirical evidence 多年實證支持

educator-driven curriculum 教育者驅動的課程

enhance diversity 增強多樣性

holistic nature of education 教育的整體(ti) 性質

pronounced inequities 明顯的不平等

involvement of teachers 教師的參與(yu)

prerogative should ultimately lie with 最終的特權應屬於(yu)