25.3.29托福考情複盤 獨家解析【口語&寫作】最新機經

本次考試口語和獨立寫(xie) 作各有3套題目。篇幅限製，今天隻展示第一套題目及名師解析。

托福口語

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

It is disrespectful for tourists to take photos of strangers without their permission.

火箭托福教研組名師解析

🚀

寫(xie) 作思路

✨隱私權問題：陌生人可能不希望自己的形象被拍攝並傳(chuan) 播，尤其是在網絡時代，未經許可的照片可能被濫用。

✨文化與(yu) 道德尊重：在某些國家和地區，未經許可拍照被認為(wei) 是不禮貌甚至是禁忌的。

參考答案

I strongly agree that taking photos of strangers without permission is disrespectful.

First, it violates privacy, as many people don’t want their images shared without consent, especially in the digital age. For example, in some cultures, photographing certain individuals, like women or children, can be seen as offensive. Second, it’s a matter of cultural respect.

In some regions, capturing someone’s photo without permission is considered highly inappropriate.Therefore, a better approach is to simply ask before taking a picture. This way, tourists can be respectful while still capturing meaningful memories.

托福寫(xie) 作

👨‍🏫教授：Should short-distance flights be banned?

👩‍🎓‍學生A：yes, since they produce pollution

🧑‍🎓學生B：no, since people may need them

解析

👩‍🎓‍學生A的立場：支持禁止短途航班

論據1：短途航班的碳排放效率低下。

短途航班的單位距離碳排放量遠高於(yu) 長途航班，因為(wei) 飛機在起飛和降落階段消耗的燃料比例較高。相比之下，高鐵或電動巴士等替代交通工具的碳排放量更低，且更適合短距離旅行。

例句：Short-distance flights produce significantly more carbon emissions per passenger-kilometer compared to trains or buses. For instance, a flight from Paris to Lyon emits about 100 kg of CO₂ per passenger, while a high-speed train emits less than 10 kg.

論據2：短途航班阻礙了綠色交通的發展。

短途航班的存在減少了人們(men) 對更環保交通工具的需求，從(cong) 而延緩了綠色交通技術的普及。如果禁止短途航班，政府和企業(ye) 將更傾(qing) 向於(yu) 投資高鐵、電動巴士等低碳交通方式，加速全球脫碳進程。

例句：Banning short-distance flights would push governments and companies to invest in greener alternatives like high-speed rail and electric buses, which are more sustainable for the environment.

🧑‍🎓學生B的立場：反對禁止短途航班，因為(wei) 人們(men) 可能需要它們(men)

論據1：短途航班滿足時間效率的需求。

對於(yu) 商務旅行者或緊急情況，短途航班提供了更快捷的出行方式。雖然高鐵或巴士可能更環保，但它們(men) 無法提供與(yu) 飛機相同的時間效率，尤其是在城市間距離較遠的情況下。

例句：For business travelers, short-distance flights save time compared to trains or buses. A flight from New York to Boston takes about 1 hour, while a train journey can take up to 4 hours.

論據2：短途航班對偏遠地區至關(guan) 重要。

在一些偏遠地區，短途航班可能是唯一的交通方式，尤其是對於(yu) 島嶼或山區的居民。禁止短途航班將對這些地區的經濟和居民生活造成嚴(yan) 重影響。

例句：Short-distance flights are vital for remote areas like Alaska or the Caribbean islands, where alternatives like trains or buses are unavailable. Banning them would isolate communities and harm local economies.